Friday, December 16, 2005

Ahh, the "attack on Christmas".

In matters such as these, I always turn to the originator of these blathering idiots' religion: the big JC himself.

Do you think JC would appreciate his birthday being turned into nothing but a hollow capitalistic hogfest to drive artificial resource consumption for our plastic kewpie doll economy?

Do you think JC would care if a holistic mother earth symbol, aka the "holiday tree", or his holiday's name, were given a slight tweak to its terminology to encourage inclusion, acceptance, peace, and love?

I mean, Jesus Christ's philosophies really aren't that hard to understand. That's really the core appeal of Christianity throughout the ages. But I guess the current "debate" scores a high Q-Factor for getting the right's panties in a bunch, so we have to put up with this.

Once again, collective human stupidity rules.

1 Comments:

Blogger Rob said...

Hey, randomly flipping through the blogs, felt I would leave a comment. Feel free to trash it.

Yes, JC would HATE the consumerism that has come to be associated with Him. A lot.

Yes, JC would object to a slight tweaking to encourage acceptance. JC was not about unconditional acceptance. He was about truth. Some of it was beautiful. Some of it was really, really hard. One of the hard things was a rejection of idolatry. This includes money, and mother earth.

Peace.

2:45 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home